Please note that you are looking at an abridged version of the output (all checks that gave normal results have been removed from this report). You can have a look at the Full report instead.
264 GOL ( 351-) A -
In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. Preferred regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green. A full explanation of the Ramachandran plot together with a series of examples can be found at the WHAT_CHECK website.
Chain identifier: A
Coordinate problems, unexpected atoms, B-factor and occupancy checks
Warning: Missing atoms
The atoms listed in the table below are missing from the entry. If many atoms
are missing, the other checks can become less sensitive. Be aware that it
often happens that groups at the termini of DNA or RNA are really missing,
so that the absence of these atoms normally is neither an error nor the
result of poor electron density. Some of the atoms listed here might also be
listed by other checks, most noticeably by the options in the previous
section that list missing atoms in several categories. The plausible atoms
with zero occupancy are not listed here, as they already got assigned a
non-zero occupancy, and thus are no longer 'missing'.
2 GLU ( 2-) A CG 2 GLU ( 2-) A CD 2 GLU ( 2-) A OE1 2 GLU ( 2-) A OE2 6 ILE ( 6-) A CG1 6 ILE ( 6-) A CG2 6 ILE ( 6-) A CD1 84 GLN ( 84-) A CG 84 GLN ( 84-) A CD 84 GLN ( 84-) A OE1 84 GLN ( 84-) A NE2 249 LEU ( 249-) A CG 249 LEU ( 249-) A CD1 249 LEU ( 249-) A CD2
Atoms want to move. That is the direct result of the second law of thermodynamics, in a somewhat weird way of thinking. Any way, many atoms seem to have more than one position where they like to sit, and they jump between them. The population difference between those sites (which is related to their energy differences) is seen in the occupancy factors. As also for atoms it is 'to be or not to be', these occupancies should add up to 1.0. Obviously, it is possible that they add up to a number less than 1.0, in cases where there are yet more, but undetected' rotamers/positions in play, but also in those cases a warning is in place as the information shown in the PDB file is less certain than it could have been. The residues listed below contain atoms that have an occupancy greater than zero, but all their alternates do not add up to one.
WARNING. Presently WHAT CHECK only deals with a maximum of two alternate positions. A small number of atoms in the PDB has three alternates. In those cases the warning given here should obviously be neglected! In a next release we will try to fix this.
1 PRO ( 1-) A 0.30 2 GLU ( 2-) A 0.30 81 GLU ( 81-) A 0.50 82 GLU ( 82-) A 0.50 83 PRO ( 83-) A 0.50 84 GLN ( 84-) A 0.50 213 GLY ( 213-) A 0.50 214 GLN ( 214-) A 0.50 215 VAL ( 215-) A 0.50
Obviously, the temperature at which the X-ray data was collected has some importance too:
Crystal temperature (K) :100.000
Note: B-factor plot
The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue
Chain identifier: A
Nomenclature related problems
Warning: Aspartic acid convention problem
The aspartic acid residues listed in the table below have their chi-2 not
between -90.0 and 90.0, or their proton on OD1 instead of OD2.
11 ASP ( 11-) A
Atom names starting with "-" belong to the previous residue in the chain. If the second atom name is "-SG*", the disulphide bridge has a deviating length.
183 ASN ( 183-) A CG OD1 1.33 5.1 183 ASN ( 183-) A CG ND2 1.23 -4.6 251 PHE ( 254-) A N -C 1.45 5.9
11 ASP ( 11-) A
17 ILE ( 17-) A 6.05 211 THR ( 211-) A 4.36 36 GLN ( 36-) A 4.24
These scores give an impression of how `normal' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.
120 PRO ( 120-) A -2.4 54 LEU ( 54-) A -2.1
Residues with `forbidden' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.
2 GLU ( 2-) A Poor phi/psi 61 ASP ( 61-) A Poor phi/psi 69 GLN ( 69-) A Poor phi/psi 104 SER ( 104-) A Poor phi/psi 216 ASP ( 216-) A Poor phi/psi 229 VAL ( 229-) A Poor phi/psi 231 HIS ( 231-) A Poor phi/psi chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -0.980
For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.
A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!
4 PRO ( 4-) A 0 17 ILE ( 17-) A 0 18 LYS ( 18-) A 0 24 ASP ( 24-) A 0 26 TRP ( 26-) A 0 28 ALA ( 28-) A 0 29 PHE ( 29-) A 0 36 GLN ( 36-) A 0 40 ILE ( 40-) A 0 43 HIS ( 43-) A 0 45 THR ( 45-) A 0 46 HIS ( 46-) A 0 50 ARG ( 50-) A 0 52 LYS ( 52-) A 0 61 ASP ( 61-) A 0 68 ASN ( 68-) A 0 69 GLN ( 69-) A 0 70 LEU ( 70-) A 0 71 TYR ( 71-) A 0 79 THR ( 79-) A 0 83 PRO ( 83-) A 0 84 GLN ( 84-) A 0 86 THR ( 86-) A 0 103 TYR ( 103-) A 0 104 SER ( 104-) A 0And so on for a total of 85 lines.
Standard deviation of omega values : 1.324
Error: Abnormally short interatomic distances
The pairs of atoms listed in the table below have an unusually short
interactomic distance; each bump is listed in only one direction.
The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centres of the two atoms. Although we believe that two water atoms at 2.4 A distance are too close, we only report water pairs that are closer than this rather short distance.
The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterion was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1-3 and 1-4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). BL indicates that the B-factors of the clashing atoms have a low B-factor thereby making this clash even more worrisome. INTRA and INTER indicate whether the clashes are between atoms in the same asymmetric unit, or atoms in symmetry related asymmetric units, respectively.
123 GLN ( 123-) A O <-> 147 ARG ( 147-) A NH2 0.42 2.28 INTRA BF 90 ARG ( 90-) A A NH1 <-> 265 HOH ( 469 ) A O 0.33 2.37 INTRA BF 239 ARG ( 239-) A CD <-> 257 CYS ( 260-) A SG 0.33 3.07 INTRA BF 4 PRO ( 4-) A O <-> 8 ARG ( 8-) A N 0.32 2.38 INTRA BF 154 ALA ( 154-) A O <-> 171 ARG ( 171-) A NH1 0.24 2.46 INTRA BL 221 HIS ( 221-) A ND1 <-> 265 HOH ( 529 ) A O 0.23 2.47 INTRA BF 112 ARG ( 112-) A NH2 <-> 114 GLU ( 114-) A OE2 0.21 2.49 INTRA BF 209 TYR ( 209-) A CD1 <-> 212 ARG ( 212-) A A NH2 0.20 2.90 INTRA BF 29 PHE ( 29-) A CE1 <-> 90 ARG ( 90-) A A NH1 0.15 2.95 INTRA BF 237 CYS ( 237-) A N <-> 242 SER ( 242-) A O 0.12 2.58 INTRA BL 181 THR ( 181-) A OG1 <-> 183 ASN ( 183-) A ND2 0.11 2.59 INTRA BF 223 ALA ( 223-) A O <-> 226 ARG ( 226-) A NE 0.09 2.61 INTRA BF 148 PHE ( 148-) A O <-> 150 ASN ( 150-) A N 0.09 2.61 INTRA BF 128 ASP ( 128-) A OD1 <-> 130 LEU ( 130-) A A N 0.08 2.62 INTRA BF 112 ARG ( 112-) A CZ <-> 114 GLU ( 114-) A OE2 0.08 2.72 INTRA BF 16 ALA ( 16-) A O <-> 20 LYS ( 20-) A NZ 0.08 2.62 INTRA BF 240 CYS ( 240-) A SG <-> 254 CYS ( 257-) A SG 0.06 3.39 INTRA BL 254 CYS ( 257-) A SG <-> 256 GLY ( 259-) A N 0.04 3.26 INTRA BL 4 PRO ( 4-) A O <-> 7 ARG ( 7-) A N 0.03 2.67 INTRA BF 96 ALA ( 96-) A N <-> 265 HOH ( 435 ) A O 0.03 2.67 INTRA BL 158 LEU ( 158-) A N <-> 159 ASP ( 159-) A N 0.02 2.58 INTRA BL 79 THR ( 79-) A N <-> 97 ASP ( 97-) A O 0.01 2.69 INTRA BF 22 LEU ( 22-) A N <-> 42 GLN ( 42-) A O 0.01 2.69 INTRA BL 237 CYS ( 237-) A CB <-> 254 CYS ( 257-) A SG 0.01 3.39 INTRA BL 204 ILE ( 204-) A N <-> 205 PRO ( 205-) A CD 0.01 2.99 INTRA BL
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.
The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.
239 ARG ( 239-) A -6.87 212 ARG ( 212-) A -6.44 82 GLU ( 82-) A -6.34 70 LEU ( 70-) A -6.00 71 TYR ( 71-) A -5.61 177 GLN ( 177-) A -5.36 215 VAL ( 215-) A -5.24 220 HIS ( 220-) A -5.09
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing
environment according to the 2nd generation packing check. The score
listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means
better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues
scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the unusual
residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a
special look at them.
84 GLN ( 84-) A -3.24 2 GLU ( 2-) A -2.74
Chain identifier: A
Water, ion, and hydrogenbond related checks
Warning: Water molecules need moving
The water molecules listed in the table below were found to be significantly
closer to a symmetry related non-water molecule than to the ones given in the
coordinate file. For optimal viewing convenience revised coordinates for
these water molecules should be given.
The number in brackets is the identifier of the water molecule in the input file. Suggested coordinates are also given in the table. Please note that alternative conformations for protein residues are not taken into account for this calculation. If you are using WHAT IF / WHAT-CHECK interactively, then the moved waters can be found in PDB format in the file: MOVEDH2O.pdb.
265 HOH ( 474 ) A O 9.07 13.53 31.82 265 HOH ( 532 ) A O 14.06 21.10 -2.29
265 HOH ( 469 ) A O Metal-coordinating Histidine residue 184 fixed to 2 Strange metal coordination for HIS 259 Metal-coordinating Histidine residue 259 fixed to 1 Metal-coordinating Histidine residue 220 fixed to 1 Metal-coordinating Histidine residue 199 fixed to 1
68 ASN ( 68-) A
Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.
Waters are not listed by this option.
7 ARG ( 7-) A NH1 60 ASN ( 60-) A ND2 66 SER ( 66-) A A OG 84 GLN ( 84-) A N 85 THR ( 85-) A N 90 ARG ( 90-) A A NE 121 PHE ( 121-) A N 137 GLU ( 137-) A N 167 GLY ( 167-) A N 177 GLN ( 177-) A NE2 185 LYS ( 185-) A N 224 LEU ( 224-) A N 225 PHE ( 225-) A N 231 HIS ( 231-) A N 239 ARG ( 239-) A NH2 252 TYR ( 255-) A N Only metal coordination for 199 HIS ( 199-) A NE2 Only metal coordination for 259 HIS ( 262-) A NE2
The output gives the ion, the valency score for the ion itself, the valency score for the suggested alternative ion, and a series of possible comments *1 indicates that the suggested alternate atom type has been observed in the PDB file at another location in space. *2 indicates that WHAT IF thinks to have found this ion type in the crystallisation conditions as described in the REMARK 280 cards of the PDB file. *S Indicates that this ions is located at a special position (i.e. at a symmetry axis). N4 stands for NH4+.
262 MG ( 302-) A -.- -.- Part of ionic cluster 262 MG ( 302-) A -.- -.- Too few ligands (3) 263 MG ( 303-) A -.- -.- Too few ligands (3)
The score listed is the valency score. This number should be close to (preferably a bit above) 1.0 for the suggested ion to be a likely alternative for the water molecule. Ions listed in brackets are good alternate choices. *1 indicates that the suggested ion-type has been observed elsewhere in the PDB file too. *2 indicates that the suggested ion-type has been observed in the REMARK 280 cards of the PDB file. Ion-B and ION-B indicate that the B-factor of this water is high, or very high, respectively. H2O-B indicates that the B-factors of atoms that surround this water/ion are suspicious. See: swift.cmbi.ru.nl/teach/theory/ for a detailed explanation.
265 HOH ( 432 ) A O 1.01 K 4
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators.
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : -0.408 2nd generation packing quality : 0.052 Ramachandran plot appearance : -1.373 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : -0.980 Backbone conformation : 0.022
Bond lengths : 0.360 (tight) Bond angles : 0.650 (tight) Omega angle restraints : 0.241 (tight) Side chain planarity : 0.212 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.528 B-factor distribution : 0.434 Inside/Outside distribution : 0.996
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators, which have been calibrated against structures of similar resolution.
Resolution found in PDB file : 2.05
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : 0.3 2nd generation packing quality : -0.4 Ramachandran plot appearance : -0.8 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : -0.4 Backbone conformation : -0.2
Bond lengths : 0.360 (tight) Bond angles : 0.650 (tight) Omega angle restraints : 0.241 (tight) Side chain planarity : 0.212 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.528 B-factor distribution : 0.434 Inside/Outside distribution : 0.996 ==============
WHAT IF G.Vriend, WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program, J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52--56 (1990). WHAT_CHECK (verification routines from WHAT IF) R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, C.Sander and E.E.Abola, Errors in protein structures Nature 381, 272 (1996). (see also http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/whatcheck for a course and extra inform Bond lengths and angles, protein residues R.Engh and R.Huber, Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392--400 (1991). Bond lengths and angles, DNA/RNA G.Parkinson, J.Voitechovsky, L.Clowney, A.T.Bruenger and H.Berman, New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures Acta Crystallogr. D52, 57--64 (1996). DSSP W.Kabsch and C.Sander, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen bond and geometrical features Biopolymers 22, 2577--2637 (1983). Hydrogen bond networks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen bond networks in protein structures PROTEINS, 26, 363--376 (1996). Matthews' Coefficient B.W.Matthews Solvent content of Protein Crystals J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491--497 (1968). Protein side chain planarity R.W.W. Hooft, C. Sander and G. Vriend, Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 714--716 (1996). Puckering parameters D.Cremer and J.A.Pople, A general definition of ring puckering coordinates J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354--1358 (1975). Quality Control G.Vriend and C.Sander, Quality control of protein models: directional atomic contact analysis, J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 47--60 (1993). Ramachandran plot G.N.Ramachandran, C.Ramakrishnan and V.Sasisekharan, Stereochemistry of Polypeptide Chain Conformations J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95--99 (1963). Symmetry Checks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Reconstruction of symmetry related molecules from protein data bank (PDB) files J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 1006--1009 (1994). Ion Checks I.D.Brown and K.K.Wu, Empirical Parameters for Calculating Cation-Oxygen Bond Valences Acta Cryst. B32, 1957--1959 (1975). M.Nayal and E.Di Cera, Valence Screening of Water in Protein Crystals Reveals Potential Na+ Binding Sites J.Mol.Biol. 256 228--234 (1996). P.Mueller, S.Koepke and G.M.Sheldrick, Is the bond-valence method able to identify metal atoms in protein structures? Acta Cryst. D 59 32--37 (2003). Checking checks K.Wilson, C.Sander, R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, et al. Who checks the checkers J.Mol.Biol. (1998) 276,417-436.