Please note that you are looking at an abridged version of the output (all checks that gave normal results have been removed from this report). You can have a look at the Full report instead.
264 3CC ( 800-) A -
Plausible side chain atoms were detected with (near) zero occupancy
When crystallographers do not see an atom they either leave it out completely, or give it an occupancy of zero or a very high B-factor. WHAT IF neglects these atoms. In this case some atoms were found with zero occupancy, but with coordinates that place them at a plausible position. Although WHAT IF knows how to deal with missing side chain atoms, validation will go more reliable if all atoms are presnt. So, please consider manually setting the occupancy of the listed atoms at 1.0.
1 SER ( 2-) A - OG 259 LYS ( 261-) A - CG 259 LYS ( 261-) A - CD 259 LYS ( 261-) A - CE 259 LYS ( 261-) A - NZ
In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. Preferred regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green. A full explanation of the Ramachandran plot together with a series of examples can be found at the WHAT_CHECK website.
Chain identifier: A
Coordinate problems, unexpected atoms, B-factor and occupancy checks
Warning: What type of B-factor?
WHAT IF does not yet know well how to cope with B-factors in case TLS has
been used. It simply assumes that the B-factor listed on the ATOM and HETATM
cards are the total B-factors. When TLS refinement is used that assumption
sometimes is not correct. TLS seems not mentioned in the header of the PDB
file. But anyway, if WHAT IF complains about your B-factors, and you think
that they are OK, then check for TLS related B-factor problems first.
Obviously, the temperature at which the X-ray data was collected has some importance too:
Crystal temperature (K) :100.000
Note: B-factor plot
The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue
Chain identifier: A
Nomenclature related problems
Warning: Tyrosine convention problem
The tyrosine residues listed in the table below have their chi-2 not between
-90.0 and 90.0
6 TYR ( 7-) A 39 TYR ( 40-) A 50 TYR ( 51-) A 87 TYR ( 88-) A 126 TYR ( 128-) A 192 TYR ( 194-) A
145 PHE ( 147-) A 229 PHE ( 231-) A
31 ASP ( 32-) A 33 ASP ( 34-) A 40 ASP ( 41-) A 71 ASP ( 72-) A 100 ASP ( 101-) A 109 ASP ( 110-) A 137 ASP ( 139-) A 178 ASP ( 180-) A 188 ASP ( 190-) A 241 ASP ( 243-) A
212 GLU ( 214-) A 232 GLU ( 234-) A 236 GLU ( 238-) A
RMS Z-score for bond lengths: 0.250
RMS-deviation in bond distances: 0.006
Warning: Unusual bond angles
The bond angles listed in the table below were found to deviate more than 4
sigma from standard bond angles (both standard values and sigma for protein
residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from
Parkinson et al [REF]). In the table below for each strange angle the bond
angle and the number of standard deviations it differs from the standard
values is given. Please note that disulphide bridges are neglected. Atoms
starting with "-" belong to the previous residue in the sequence.
206 THR ( 208-) A N CA C 99.93 -4.0
31 ASP ( 32-) A 33 ASP ( 34-) A 40 ASP ( 41-) A 71 ASP ( 72-) A 100 ASP ( 101-) A 109 ASP ( 110-) A 137 ASP ( 139-) A 178 ASP ( 180-) A 188 ASP ( 190-) A 212 GLU ( 214-) A 232 GLU ( 234-) A 236 GLU ( 238-) A 241 ASP ( 243-) A
205 VAL ( 207-) A 4.99 196 LEU ( 198-) A 4.08 206 THR ( 208-) A 4.01 95 HIS ( 96-) A 4.00
These scores give an impression of how `normal' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.
174 PHE ( 176-) A -2.3 82 PRO ( 83-) A -2.2 149 GLY ( 151-) A -2.1 161 VAL ( 163-) A -2.1 91 GLN ( 92-) A -2.0
Residues with `forbidden' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.
28 SER ( 29-) A PRO omega poor 63 HIS ( 64-) A Poor phi/psi 75 LYS ( 76-) A Poor phi/psi 110 LYS ( 111-) A Poor phi/psi 176 ASN ( 178-) A Poor phi/psi 199 PRO ( 201-) A PRO omega poor 201 LEU ( 203-) A Poor phi/psi 241 ASP ( 243-) A Poor phi/psi 250 LYS ( 252-) A Poor phi/psi 251 ASN ( 253-) A Poor phi/psi chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : 0.237
For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.
A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!
3 HIS ( 4-) A 0 4 TRP ( 5-) A 0 6 TYR ( 7-) A 0 9 HIS ( 10-) A 0 18 ASP ( 19-) A 0 19 PHE ( 20-) A 0 23 LYS ( 24-) A 0 26 ARG ( 27-) A 0 27 GLN ( 28-) A 0 28 SER ( 29-) A 0 37 ALA ( 38-) A 0 44 LYS ( 45-) A 0 49 SER ( 50-) A 0 53 ALA ( 54-) A 0 61 ASN ( 62-) A 0 63 HIS ( 64-) A 0 71 ASP ( 72-) A 0 72 SER ( 73-) A 0 75 LYS ( 76-) A 0 76 ALA ( 77-) A 0 79 LYS ( 80-) A 0 82 PRO ( 83-) A 0 84 ASP ( 85-) A 0 91 GLN ( 92-) A 0 94 PHE ( 95-) A 0And so on for a total of 116 lines.
Standard deviation of omega values : 1.718
Error: Abnormally short interatomic distances
The pairs of atoms listed in the table below have an unusually short
interactomic distance; each bump is listed in only one direction.
The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centres of the two atoms. Although we believe that two water atoms at 2.4 A distance are too close, we only report water pairs that are closer than this rather short distance.
The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterion was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1-3 and 1-4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). BL indicates that the B-factors of the clashing atoms have a low B-factor thereby making this clash even more worrisome. INTRA and INTER indicate whether the clashes are between atoms in the same asymmetric unit, or atoms in symmetry related asymmetric units, respectively.
14 HIS ( 15-) A ND1 <-> 17 LYS ( 18-) A NZ 0.22 2.78 INTRA BL 166 LYS ( 168-) A NZ <-> 265 HOH ( 364 ) A O 0.21 2.49 INTRA 39 TYR ( 40-) A CE2 <-> 259 LYS ( 261-) A CE 0.13 3.07 INTRA BL 110 LYS ( 111-) A NZ <-> 265 HOH ( 529 ) A O 0.09 2.61 INTRA 134 GLN ( 136-) A N <-> 135 GLN ( 137-) A N 0.08 2.52 INTRA BL 1 SER ( 2-) A O <-> 3 HIS ( 4-) A ND1 0.06 2.64 INTRA 106 HIS ( 107-) A NE2 <-> 192 TYR ( 194-) A OH 0.05 2.65 INTRA BL 116 GLU ( 117-) A OE2 <-> 118 HIS ( 119-) A NE2 0.04 2.66 INTRA BL 24 GLY ( 25-) A O <-> 250 LYS ( 252-) A NZ 0.03 2.67 INTRA 98 SER ( 99-) A N <-> 99 LEU ( 100-) A N 0.02 2.58 INTRA BL 111 LYS ( 112-) A NZ <-> 265 HOH ( 542 ) A O 0.01 2.69 INTRA 50 TYR ( 51-) A OH <-> 121 HIS ( 122-) A NE2 0.01 2.69 INTRA BL
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.
The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.
9 HIS ( 10-) A -5.98 99 LEU ( 100-) A -5.15
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing
environment according to the 2nd generation packing check. The score
listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means
better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues
scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the unusual
residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a
special look at them.
17 LYS ( 18-) A -2.58 44 LYS ( 45-) A -2.56
Chain identifier: A
Water, ion, and hydrogenbond related checks
Warning: Water molecules need moving
The water molecules listed in the table below were found to be significantly
closer to a symmetry related non-water molecule than to the ones given in the
coordinate file. For optimal viewing convenience revised coordinates for
these water molecules should be given.
The number in brackets is the identifier of the water molecule in the input file. Suggested coordinates are also given in the table. Please note that alternative conformations for protein residues are not taken into account for this calculation. If you are using WHAT IF / WHAT-CHECK interactively, then the moved waters can be found in PDB format in the file: MOVEDH2O.pdb.
265 HOH ( 491 ) A O -7.87 7.38 27.40 265 HOH ( 513 ) A O -6.00 0.22 39.92 265 HOH ( 545 ) A O -10.02 -23.60 9.23 265 HOH ( 606 ) A O 13.85 -1.29 28.62 265 HOH ( 610 ) A O -2.76 -19.44 6.46 265 HOH ( 618 ) A O 9.54 -5.16 -7.58 265 HOH ( 623 ) A O -15.67 16.55 3.11
9 HIS ( 10-) A 66 ASN ( 67-) A 135 GLN ( 137-) A 176 ASN ( 178-) A 253 GLN ( 255-) A
Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.
Waters are not listed by this option.
28 SER ( 29-) A OG 30 VAL ( 31-) A N 75 LYS ( 76-) A NZ 99 LEU ( 100-) A N 180 ARG ( 182-) A NE 198 THR ( 200-) A N 202 LEU ( 204-) A N 228 ASN ( 230-) A ND2 242 ASN ( 244-) A ND2 243 TRP ( 245-) A N 258 PHE ( 260-) A N Only metal coordination for 93 HIS ( 94-) A NE2 Only metal coordination for 95 HIS ( 96-) A NE2 Only metal coordination for 118 HIS ( 119-) A ND1
The score listed is the valency score. This number should be close to (preferably a bit above) 1.0 for the suggested ion to be a likely alternative for the water molecule. Ions listed in brackets are good alternate choices. *1 indicates that the suggested ion-type has been observed elsewhere in the PDB file too. *2 indicates that the suggested ion-type has been observed in the REMARK 280 cards of the PDB file. Ion-B and ION-B indicate that the B-factor of this water is high, or very high, respectively. H2O-B indicates that the B-factors of atoms that surround this water/ion are suspicious. See: swift.cmbi.ru.nl/teach/theory/ for a detailed explanation.
265 HOH ( 334 ) A O 1.03 K 4 265 HOH ( 375 ) A O 0.85 K 5 265 HOH ( 400 ) A O 1.07 K 4 265 HOH ( 422 ) A O 1.00 K 4 265 HOH ( 443 ) A O 0.95 K 5 Ion-B
160 ASP ( 162-) A H-bonding suggests Asn; but Alt-Rotamer 163 ASP ( 165-) A H-bonding suggests Asn; but Alt-Rotamer
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators.
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : -0.165 2nd generation packing quality : 0.510 Ramachandran plot appearance : -1.378 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : 0.237 Backbone conformation : -1.027
Bond lengths : 0.250 (tight) Bond angles : 0.668 Omega angle restraints : 0.312 (tight) Side chain planarity : 0.276 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.576 B-factor distribution : 0.564 Inside/Outside distribution : 0.958
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators, which have been calibrated against structures of similar resolution.
Resolution found in PDB file : 1.40
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : 0.1 2nd generation packing quality : -0.4 Ramachandran plot appearance : -1.7 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : -0.3 Backbone conformation : -1.4
Bond lengths : 0.250 (tight) Bond angles : 0.668 Omega angle restraints : 0.312 (tight) Side chain planarity : 0.276 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.576 B-factor distribution : 0.564 Inside/Outside distribution : 0.958 ==============
WHAT IF G.Vriend, WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program, J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52--56 (1990). WHAT_CHECK (verification routines from WHAT IF) R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, C.Sander and E.E.Abola, Errors in protein structures Nature 381, 272 (1996). (see also http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/whatcheck for a course and extra inform Bond lengths and angles, protein residues R.Engh and R.Huber, Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392--400 (1991). Bond lengths and angles, DNA/RNA G.Parkinson, J.Voitechovsky, L.Clowney, A.T.Bruenger and H.Berman, New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures Acta Crystallogr. D52, 57--64 (1996). DSSP W.Kabsch and C.Sander, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen bond and geometrical features Biopolymers 22, 2577--2637 (1983). Hydrogen bond networks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen bond networks in protein structures PROTEINS, 26, 363--376 (1996). Matthews' Coefficient B.W.Matthews Solvent content of Protein Crystals J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491--497 (1968). Protein side chain planarity R.W.W. Hooft, C. Sander and G. Vriend, Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 714--716 (1996). Puckering parameters D.Cremer and J.A.Pople, A general definition of ring puckering coordinates J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354--1358 (1975). Quality Control G.Vriend and C.Sander, Quality control of protein models: directional atomic contact analysis, J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 47--60 (1993). Ramachandran plot G.N.Ramachandran, C.Ramakrishnan and V.Sasisekharan, Stereochemistry of Polypeptide Chain Conformations J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95--99 (1963). Symmetry Checks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Reconstruction of symmetry related molecules from protein data bank (PDB) files J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 1006--1009 (1994). Ion Checks I.D.Brown and K.K.Wu, Empirical Parameters for Calculating Cation-Oxygen Bond Valences Acta Cryst. B32, 1957--1959 (1975). M.Nayal and E.Di Cera, Valence Screening of Water in Protein Crystals Reveals Potential Na+ Binding Sites J.Mol.Biol. 256 228--234 (1996). P.Mueller, S.Koepke and G.M.Sheldrick, Is the bond-valence method able to identify metal atoms in protein structures? Acta Cryst. D 59 32--37 (2003). Checking checks K.Wilson, C.Sander, R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, et al. Who checks the checkers J.Mol.Biol. (1998) 276,417-436.