Please note that you are looking at an abridged version of the output (all checks that gave normal results have been removed from this report). You can have a look at the Full report instead.
299 IZ3 (1299-) A -
In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. Preferred regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green. A full explanation of the Ramachandran plot together with a series of examples can be found at the WHAT_CHECK website.
Chain identifier: A
Coordinate problems, unexpected atoms, B-factor and occupancy checks
Warning: C-terminal nitrogen atoms detected.
It is becoming habit to indicate that a residue is not the true C-terminus
by including only the backbone N of the next residue. This has been
observed in this PDB file.
In X-ray the coordinates must be located in density. Mobility or disorder sometimes cause this density to be so poor that the positions of the atoms cannot be determined. Crystallographers tend to leave out the atoms in such cases. In many cases the N- or C-terminal residues are too disordered to see. In case of the N-terminus, you can see from the residue numbers if there are missing residues, but at the C-terminus this is impossible. Therefore, often the position of the backbone nitrogen of the first residue missing at the C-terminal end is calculated and added to indicate that there are missing residues. As a single N causes validation trouble, we remove these single-N-residues before doing the validation. But, if you get weird errors at, or near, the left-over incomplete C-terminal residue, please check by hand if a missing Oxt or removed N is the cause.
297 LEU ( 299-) A
Obviously, the temperature at which the X-ray data was collected has some importance too:
Crystal temperature (K) : 93.000
Note: B-factor plot
The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue
Chain identifier: A
Nomenclature related problems
Warning: Aspartic acid convention problem
The aspartic acid residues listed in the table below have their chi-2 not
between -90.0 and 90.0, or their proton on OD1 instead of OD2.
9 ASP ( 11-) A
24 GLU ( 26-) A 60 GLU ( 62-) A 130 GLU ( 132-) A 134 GLU ( 136-) A 165 GLU ( 167-) A 184 GLU ( 186-) A 295 GLU ( 297-) A
There are a number of different possible causes for the discrepancy. First the cell used in refinement can be different from the best cell calculated. Second, the value of the wavelength used for a synchrotron data set can be miscalibrated. Finally, the discrepancy can be caused by a dataset that has not been corrected for significant anisotropic thermal motion.
Please note that the proposed scale matrix has NOT been restrained to obey the space group symmetry. This is done on purpose. The distortions can give you an indication of the accuracy of the determination.
If you intend to use the result of this check to change the cell dimension of your crystal, please read the extensive literature on this topic first. This check depends on the wavelength, the cell dimensions, and on the standard bond lengths and bond angles used by your refinement software.
Unit Cell deformation matrix
| 0.996890 -0.000907 0.000262| | -0.000907 0.998353 -0.000558| | 0.000262 -0.000558 0.997376|Proposed new scale matrix
| 0.015017 0.000014 -0.000004| | 0.000013 0.013774 0.000008| | -0.000003 0.000006 0.011377|With corresponding cell
A = 66.593 B = 72.602 C = 87.898 Alpha= 90.064 Beta= 89.970 Gamma= 90.104
The CRYST1 cell dimensions
A = 66.800 B = 72.720 C = 88.130 Alpha= 90.000 Beta= 90.000 Gamma= 90.000
(Under-)estimated Z-score: 5.936
Warning: Unusual bond angles
The bond angles listed in the table below were found to deviate more than 4
sigma from standard bond angles (both standard values and sigma for protein
residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from
Parkinson et al [REF]). In the table below for each strange angle the bond
angle and the number of standard deviations it differs from the standard
values is given. Please note that disulphide bridges are neglected. Atoms
starting with "-" belong to the previous residue in the sequence.
173 HIS ( 175-) A CG ND1 CE1 109.60 4.0 213 CYS ( 215-) A N CA C 99.65 -4.1
9 ASP ( 11-) A 24 GLU ( 26-) A 60 GLU ( 62-) A 130 GLU ( 132-) A 134 GLU ( 136-) A 165 GLU ( 167-) A 184 GLU ( 186-) A 295 GLU ( 297-) A
64 TYR ( 66-) A 4.67 213 CYS ( 215-) A 4.55 186 PRO ( 188-) A 4.54
These scores give an impression of how `normal' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.
294 HIS ( 296-) A -2.9 164 GLN ( 166-) A -2.1 213 CYS ( 215-) A -2.1
Residues with `forbidden' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.
76 GLN ( 78-) A Poor phi/psi 101 LYS ( 103-) A Poor phi/psi 137 ASN ( 139-) A Poor phi/psi 164 GLN ( 166-) A Poor phi/psi 180 PHE ( 182-) A Poor phi/psi 213 CYS ( 215-) A Poor phi/psi 259 ILE ( 261-) A Poor phi/psi chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -0.605
It is not necessarily an error if a few residues have rotamer values below 0.3, but careful inspection of all residues with these low values could be worth it.
220 SER ( 222-) A 0.40
For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.
A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!
11 SER ( 13-) A 0 13 SER ( 15-) A 0 14 TRP ( 16-) A 0 29 PRO ( 31-) A 0 30 CYS ( 32-) A 0 44 TYR ( 46-) A 0 58 HIS ( 60-) A 0 61 ASP ( 63-) A 0 65 ILE ( 67-) A 0 66 ASN ( 68-) A 0 75 ALA ( 77-) A 0 76 GLN ( 78-) A 0 89 THR ( 91-) A 0 90 CYS ( 92-) A 0 100 GLN ( 102-) A 0 101 LYS ( 103-) A 0 102 SER ( 104-) A 0 108 LEU ( 110-) A 0 109 ASN ( 111-) A 0 112 MET ( 114-) A 0 113 GLU ( 115-) A 0 114 LYS ( 116-) A 0 119 CYS ( 121-) A 0 122 TYR ( 124-) A 0 123 TRP ( 125-) A 0And so on for a total of 98 lines.
Standard deviation of omega values : 1.813
Warning: Unusual PRO puckering phases
The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering phase that is
not expected to occur in protein structures. Puckering parameters were
calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings
approximately show a so-called envelope conformation with the C-gamma atom
above the plane of the ring (phi=+72 degrees), or a half-chair conformation
with C-gamma below and C-beta above the plane of the ring (phi=-90 degrees).
If phi deviates strongly from these values, this is indicative of a very
strange conformation for a PRO residue, and definitely requires a manual
check of the data. Be aware that this is a warning with a low confidence
level. See: Who checks the checkers? Four validation tools applied to eight
atomic resolution structures [REF].
36 PRO ( 38-) A 100.0 envelop C-beta (108 degrees) 239 PRO ( 241-) A -114.9 envelop C-gamma (-108 degrees)
The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centres of the two atoms. Although we believe that two water atoms at 2.4 A distance are too close, we only report water pairs that are closer than this rather short distance.
The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterion was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1-3 and 1-4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). BL indicates that the B-factors of the clashing atoms have a low B-factor thereby making this clash even more worrisome. INTRA and INTER indicate whether the clashes are between atoms in the same asymmetric unit, or atoms in symmetry related asymmetric units, respectively.
244 ILE ( 246-) A CG2 <-> 269 TYR ( 271-) A CZ 0.17 3.03 INTRA 165 GLU ( 167-) A OE1 <-> 299 HOH (2216 ) A O 0.16 2.24 INTRA 135 ASP ( 137-) A N <-> 299 HOH (2191 ) A O 0.08 2.62 INTRA BF 27 ASP ( 29-) A OD1 <-> 299 HOH (2043 ) A O 0.07 2.33 INTRA 8 ILE ( 10-) A CG2 <-> 14 TRP ( 16-) A CE2 0.06 3.14 INTRA 298 IZ3 (1299-) A O1 <-> 299 HOH (2285 ) A O 0.06 2.34 INTRA BL 213 CYS ( 215-) A SG <-> 216 GLY ( 218-) A N 0.05 3.25 INTRA BL 111 VAL ( 113-) A CG1 <-> 299 HOH (2169 ) A O 0.04 2.76 INTRA 157 GLU ( 159-) A OE2 <-> 299 HOH (2210 ) A O 0.03 2.37 INTRA 95 GLU ( 97-) A OE2 <-> 99 GLU ( 101-) A OE2 0.03 2.37 INTRA 2 GLU ( 4-) A OE2 <-> 299 HOH (2002 ) A O 0.03 2.37 INTRA 103 ARG ( 105-) A NH1 <-> 168 GLU ( 170-) A OE2 0.02 2.68 INTRA 118 LYS ( 120-) A NZ <-> 179 ASP ( 181-) A OD2 0.02 2.68 INTRA BL 130 GLU ( 132-) A OE2 <-> 299 HOH (2188 ) A O 0.02 2.38 INTRA 214 SER ( 216-) A N <-> 298 IZ3 (1299-) A O6 0.02 2.68 INTRA BL 281 GLY ( 283-) A O <-> 282 ASP ( 284-) A C 0.02 2.58 INTRA BF 151 TYR ( 153-) A OH <-> 195 LYS ( 197-) A CE 0.01 2.79 INTRA 174 TYR ( 176-) A OH <-> 299 HOH (2226 ) A O 0.01 2.39 INTRA 46 ASP ( 48-) A OD1 <-> 298 IZ3 (1299-) A N45 0.01 2.69 INTRA BL
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.
The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.
237 LYS ( 239-) A -6.40 180 PHE ( 182-) A -6.35 184 GLU ( 186-) A -5.97 205 GLU ( 207-) A -5.25 114 LYS ( 116-) A -5.00
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing
environment according to the 2nd generation packing check. The score
listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means
better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues
scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the unusual
residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a
special look at them.
52 HIS ( 54-) A -2.77 46 ASP ( 48-) A -2.72
The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue Z-score of the series.
43 ARG ( 45-) A - 46 ASP ( 48-) A -1.98
Chain identifier: A
Water, ion, and hydrogenbond related checks
Error: Water molecules without hydrogen bonds
The water molecules listed in the table below do not form any hydrogen bonds,
neither with the protein or DNA/RNA, nor with other water molecules. This is
a strong indication of a refinement problem. The last number on each line is
the identifier of the water molecule in the input file.
299 HOH (2123 ) A O Marked this atom as acceptor 298 IZ3 (1299-) A F1 Marked this atom as acceptor 298 IZ3 (1299-) A F2
38 ASN ( 40-) A 100 GLN ( 102-) A
Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.
Waters are not listed by this option.
3 LYS ( 5-) A N 28 PHE ( 30-) A N 31 ARG ( 33-) A NH2 59 GLN ( 61-) A N 71 LYS ( 73-) A N 109 ASN ( 111-) A ND2 121 GLN ( 123-) A NE2 123 TRP ( 125-) A N 134 GLU ( 136-) A N 151 TYR ( 153-) A N 176 THR ( 178-) A N 213 CYS ( 215-) A N 214 SER ( 216-) A N 215 ALA ( 217-) A N 218 GLY ( 220-) A N 219 ARG ( 221-) A N 219 ARG ( 221-) A NE 219 ARG ( 221-) A NH2 258 LEU ( 260-) A N 264 GLN ( 266-) A NE2 286 GLN ( 288-) A N 287 ASP ( 289-) A N
Side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors buried inside the protein normally form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any not hydrogen bonded in the optimized hydrogen bond network they will be listed here.
Waters are not listed by this option.
40 ASN ( 42-) A OD1
The score listed is the valency score. This number should be close to (preferably a bit above) 1.0 for the suggested ion to be a likely alternative for the water molecule. Ions listed in brackets are good alternate choices. *1 indicates that the suggested ion-type has been observed elsewhere in the PDB file too. *2 indicates that the suggested ion-type has been observed in the REMARK 280 cards of the PDB file. Ion-B and ION-B indicate that the B-factor of this water is high, or very high, respectively. H2O-B indicates that the B-factors of atoms that surround this water/ion are suspicious. See: swift.cmbi.ru.nl/teach/theory/ for a detailed explanation.
299 HOH (2005 ) A O 0.91 NA 4 Ion-B 299 HOH (2116 ) A O 1.09 K 4 299 HOH (2255 ) A O 1.07 K 4 Ion-B 299 HOH (2273 ) A O 1.01 K 4
6 GLU ( 8-) A H-bonding suggests Gln 20 ASP ( 22-) A H-bonding suggests Asn; but Alt-Rotamer
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators.
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : 0.345 2nd generation packing quality : -1.434 Ramachandran plot appearance : 0.290 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : -0.605 Backbone conformation : -0.191
Bond lengths : 0.431 (tight) Bond angles : 0.699 Omega angle restraints : 0.330 (tight) Side chain planarity : 0.306 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.685 B-factor distribution : 0.570 Inside/Outside distribution : 1.011
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators, which have been calibrated against structures of similar resolution.
Resolution found in PDB file : 2.00
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : 0.8 2nd generation packing quality : -1.0 Ramachandran plot appearance : 0.8 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : 0.1 Backbone conformation : -0.3
Bond lengths : 0.431 (tight) Bond angles : 0.699 Omega angle restraints : 0.330 (tight) Side chain planarity : 0.306 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.685 B-factor distribution : 0.570 Inside/Outside distribution : 1.011 ==============
WHAT IF G.Vriend, WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program, J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52--56 (1990). WHAT_CHECK (verification routines from WHAT IF) R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, C.Sander and E.E.Abola, Errors in protein structures Nature 381, 272 (1996). (see also http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/whatcheck for a course and extra inform Bond lengths and angles, protein residues R.Engh and R.Huber, Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392--400 (1991). Bond lengths and angles, DNA/RNA G.Parkinson, J.Voitechovsky, L.Clowney, A.T.Bruenger and H.Berman, New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures Acta Crystallogr. D52, 57--64 (1996). DSSP W.Kabsch and C.Sander, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen bond and geometrical features Biopolymers 22, 2577--2637 (1983). Hydrogen bond networks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen bond networks in protein structures PROTEINS, 26, 363--376 (1996). Matthews' Coefficient B.W.Matthews Solvent content of Protein Crystals J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491--497 (1968). Protein side chain planarity R.W.W. Hooft, C. Sander and G. Vriend, Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 714--716 (1996). Puckering parameters D.Cremer and J.A.Pople, A general definition of ring puckering coordinates J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354--1358 (1975). Quality Control G.Vriend and C.Sander, Quality control of protein models: directional atomic contact analysis, J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 47--60 (1993). Ramachandran plot G.N.Ramachandran, C.Ramakrishnan and V.Sasisekharan, Stereochemistry of Polypeptide Chain Conformations J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95--99 (1963). Symmetry Checks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Reconstruction of symmetry related molecules from protein data bank (PDB) files J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 1006--1009 (1994). Ion Checks I.D.Brown and K.K.Wu, Empirical Parameters for Calculating Cation-Oxygen Bond Valences Acta Cryst. B32, 1957--1959 (1975). M.Nayal and E.Di Cera, Valence Screening of Water in Protein Crystals Reveals Potential Na+ Binding Sites J.Mol.Biol. 256 228--234 (1996). P.Mueller, S.Koepke and G.M.Sheldrick, Is the bond-valence method able to identify metal atoms in protein structures? Acta Cryst. D 59 32--37 (2003). Checking checks K.Wilson, C.Sander, R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, et al. Who checks the checkers J.Mol.Biol. (1998) 276,417-436.