WHAT IF Check report

This file was created 2012-01-29 from WHAT_CHECK output by a conversion script. If you are new to WHAT_CHECK, please study the pdbreport pages. There also exists a legend to the output.

Please note that you are looking at an abridged version of the output (all checks that gave normal results have been removed from this report). You can have a look at the Full report instead.

Verification log for pdb3bt8.ent

Non-validating, descriptive output paragraph

Note: Ramachandran plot

In this Ramachandran plot x-signs represent glycines, squares represent prolines, and plus-signs represent the other residues. If too many plus- signs fall outside the contoured areas then the molecule is poorly refined (or worse). Proline can only occur in the narrow region around phi=-60 that also falls within the other contour islands.

In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. Preferred regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green. A full explanation of the Ramachandran plot together with a series of examples can be found at the WHAT_CHECK website.

Chain identifier: A

Coordinate problems, unexpected atoms, B-factor and occupancy checks

Warning: Missing atoms

The atoms listed in the table below are missing from the entry. If many atoms are missing, the other checks can become less sensitive. Be aware that it often happens that groups at the termini of DNA or RNA are really missing, so that the absence of these atoms normally is neither an error nor the result of poor electron density. Some of the atoms listed here might also be listed by other checks, most noticeably by the options in the previous section that list missing atoms in several categories. The plausible atoms with zero occupancy are not listed here, as they already got assigned a non-zero occupancy, and thus are no longer 'missing'.

   1 GLU   (  22-)  A      CG
   1 GLU   (  22-)  A      CD
   1 GLU   (  22-)  A      OE1
   1 GLU   (  22-)  A      OE2
  60 GLN   (  81-)  A      CG
  60 GLN   (  81-)  A      CD
  60 GLN   (  81-)  A      OE1
  60 GLN   (  81-)  A      NE2
 149 ASN   ( 170-)  A      CG
 149 ASN   ( 170-)  A      OD1
 149 ASN   ( 170-)  A      ND2
 150 SER   ( 171-)  A      OG

Warning: What type of B-factor?

WHAT IF does not yet know well how to cope with B-factors in case TLS has been used. It simply assumes that the B-factor listed on the ATOM and HETATM cards are the total B-factors. When TLS refinement is used that assumption sometimes is not correct. TLS seems not mentioned in the header of the PDB file. But anyway, if WHAT IF complains about your B-factors, and you think that they are OK, then check for TLS related B-factor problems first.

Obviously, the temperature at which the X-ray data was collected has some importance too:

Crystal temperature (K) :293.000

Error: The B-factors of bonded atoms show signs of over-refinement

For each of the bond types in a protein a distribution was derived for the difference between the square roots of the B-factors of the two atoms. All bonds in the current protein were scored against these distributions. The number given below is the RMS Z-score over the structure. For a structure with completely restrained B-factors within residues, this value will be around 0.35, for extremely high resolution structures refined with free isotropic B-factors this number is expected to be near 1.0. Any value over 1.5 is sign of severe over-refinement of B-factors.

RMS Z-score : 1.536 over 1131 bonds
Average difference in B over a bond : 4.00
RMS difference in B over a bond : 5.15

Note: B-factor plot

The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue number.

Chain identifier: A

Nomenclature related problems

Warning: Tyrosine convention problem

The tyrosine residues listed in the table below have their chi-2 not between -90.0 and 90.0

  50 TYR   (  71-)  A

Warning: Phenylalanine convention problem

The phenylalanine residues listed in the table below have their chi-2 not between -90.0 and 90.0.

  27 PHE   (  48-)  A

Warning: Aspartic acid convention problem

The aspartic acid residues listed in the table below have their chi-2 not between -90.0 and 90.0, or their proton on OD1 instead of OD2.

  11 ASP   (  32-)  A
  52 ASP   (  73-)  A
  73 ASP   (  94-)  A
 138 ASP   ( 159-)  A

Warning: Glutamic acid convention problem

The glutamic acid residues listed in the table below have their chi-3 outside the -90.0 to 90.0 range, or their proton on OE1 instead of OE2.

  17 GLU   (  38-)  A
 144 GLU   ( 165-)  A

Geometric checks

Error: Nomenclature error(s)

Checking for a hand-check. WHAT IF has over the course of this session already corrected the handedness of atoms in several residues. These were administrative corrections. These residues are listed here.

  11 ASP   (  32-)  A
  17 GLU   (  38-)  A
  52 ASP   (  73-)  A
  73 ASP   (  94-)  A
 138 ASP   ( 159-)  A
 144 GLU   ( 165-)  A

Torsion-related checks

Warning: Torsion angle evaluation shows unusual residues

The residues listed in the table below contain bad or abnormal torsion angles.

These scores give an impression of how `normal' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.

  16 SER   (  37-)  A    -2.5
  63 MET   (  84-)  A    -2.4
 110 GLY   ( 131-)  A    -2.1
  62 PHE   (  83-)  A    -2.0

Warning: Backbone evaluation reveals unusual conformations

The residues listed in the table below have abnormal backbone torsion angles.

Residues with `forbidden' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.

  14 ILE   (  35-)  A  Poor phi/psi
  15 ASP   (  36-)  A  Poor phi/psi
  16 SER   (  37-)  A  Poor phi/psi
  52 ASP   (  73-)  A  Poor phi/psi
  61 ASN   (  82-)  A  Poor phi/psi
  63 MET   (  84-)  A  Poor phi/psi
  74 GLY   (  95-)  A  Poor phi/psi
 107 ASN   ( 128-)  A  Poor phi/psi
 149 ASN   ( 170-)  A  Poor phi/psi
 151 HIS   ( 172-)  A  Poor phi/psi
 152 ASP   ( 173-)  A  Poor phi/psi
 chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -2.014

Warning: Unusual backbone conformations

For the residues listed in the table below, the backbone formed by itself and two neighbouring residues on either side is in a conformation that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. The number given in the table is the number of similar backbone conformations in the database with the same amino acid in the centre.

For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.

A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!

  13 MET   (  34-)  A      0
  14 ILE   (  35-)  A      0
  15 ASP   (  36-)  A      0
  16 SER   (  37-)  A      0
  19 LEU   (  40-)  A      0
  21 ARG   (  42-)  A      0
  27 PHE   (  48-)  A      0
  30 ASP   (  51-)  A      0
  45 GLU   (  66-)  A      0
  48 PHE   (  69-)  A      0
  50 TYR   (  71-)  A      0
  51 LYS   (  72-)  A      0
  53 SER   (  74-)  A      0
  54 ILE   (  75-)  A      0
  55 PHE   (  76-)  A      0
  56 HIS   (  77-)  A      0
  60 GLN   (  81-)  A      0
  61 ASN   (  82-)  A      0
  62 PHE   (  83-)  A      0
  63 MET   (  84-)  A      0
  70 THR   (  91-)  A      0
  71 ASN   (  92-)  A      0
  72 PHE   (  93-)  A      0
  73 ASP   (  94-)  A      0
  75 THR   (  96-)  A      0
And so on for a total of 91 lines.

Warning: Omega angles too tightly restrained

The omega angles for trans-peptide bonds in a structure are expected to give a gaussian distribution with the average around +178 degrees and a standard deviation around 5.5 degrees. These expected values were obtained from very accurately determined structures. Many protein structures are too tightly restrained. This seems to be the case with the current structure too, as the observed standard deviation is below 4.0 degrees.

Standard deviation of omega values : 1.479

Bump checks

Error: Abnormally short interatomic distances

The pairs of atoms listed in the table below have an unusually short interactomic distance; each bump is listed in only one direction.

The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centres of the two atoms. Although we believe that two water atoms at 2.4 A distance are too close, we only report water pairs that are closer than this rather short distance.

The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterion was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1-3 and 1-4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). BL indicates that the B-factors of the clashing atoms have a low B-factor thereby making this clash even more worrisome. INTRA and INTER indicate whether the clashes are between atoms in the same asymmetric unit, or atoms in symmetry related asymmetric units, respectively.

   1 GLU   (  22-)  A      N   <->  168 HOH   ( 188 )  A      O      0.49    2.21  INTRA
  70 THR   (  91-)  A      C   <->   71 ASN   (  92-)  A      ND2    0.31    2.69  INTRA
  70 THR   (  91-)  A      OG1 <->   77 GLY   (  98-)  A      N      0.13    2.57  INTRA
   1 GLU   (  22-)  A      CA  <->  168 HOH   ( 188 )  A      O      0.12    2.68  INTRA
  40 GLN   (  61-)  A      OE1 <->   46 HIS   (  67-)  A      NE2    0.12    2.58  INTRA
  12 VAL   (  33-)  A      CG1 <->   13 MET   (  34-)  A      N      0.05    2.95  INTRA
  52 ASP   (  73-)  A      N   <->  160 ILE   ( 181-)  A      O      0.05    2.65  INTRA
 149 ASN   ( 170-)  A      CB  <->  150 SER   ( 171-)  A      N      0.05    2.65  INTRA BF
 150 SER   ( 171-)  A      O   <->  153 ARG   ( 174-)  A      NE     0.04    2.66  INTRA BF
  56 HIS   (  77-)  A      ND1 <->  168 HOH   ( 193 )  A      O      0.03    2.67  INTRA
 149 ASN   ( 170-)  A      N   <->  153 ARG   ( 174-)  A      O      0.03    2.67  INTRA BF
  67 GLY   (  88-)  A      N   <->  168 HOH   ( 192 )  A      O      0.02    2.68  INTRA BL
  94 HIS   ( 115-)  A      ND1 <->  124 ASP   ( 145-)  A      OD1    0.02    2.68  INTRA
  11 ASP   (  32-)  A      N   <->  162 ALA   ( 183-)  A      O      0.02    2.68  INTRA
  88 GLU   ( 109-)  A      N   <->  168 HOH   ( 191 )  A      O      0.01    2.69  INTRA BL
 111 SER   ( 132-)  A      N   <->  112 GLN   ( 133-)  A      N      0.01    2.59  INTRA BL

Packing, accessibility and threading

Note: Inside/Outside RMS Z-score plot

The Inside/Outside distribution normality RMS Z-score over a 15 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. High areas in the plot (above 1.5) indicate unusual inside/outside patterns.

Chain identifier: A

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.

The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.

 151 HIS   ( 172-)  A      -6.29
  83 GLU   ( 104-)  A      -5.06

Note: Quality value plot

The quality value smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -2.0) indicate unusual packing.

Chain identifier: A

Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment according to the 2nd generation packing check. The score listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the unusual residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a special look at them.

  46 HIS   (  67-)  A   -2.86

Note: Second generation quality Z-score plot

The second generation quality Z-score smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -1.3) indicate unusual packing.

Chain identifier: A

Water, ion, and hydrogenbond related checks

Error: HIS, ASN, GLN side chain flips

Listed here are Histidine, Asparagine or Glutamine residues for which the orientation determined from hydrogen bonding analysis are different from the assignment given in the input. Either they could form energetically more favourable hydrogen bonds if the terminal group was rotated by 180 degrees, or there is no assignment in the input file (atom type 'A') but an assignment could be made. Be aware, though, that if the topology could not be determined for one or more ligands, then this option will make errors.

  71 ASN   (  92-)  A
  91 ASN   ( 112-)  A
 103 ASN   ( 124-)  A

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors

The buried hydrogen bond donors listed in the table below have a hydrogen atom that is not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.

Waters are not listed by this option.

  17 GLU   (  38-)  A      N
  48 PHE   (  69-)  A      N
  54 ILE   (  75-)  A      N
  56 HIS   (  77-)  A      N
  89 ASN   ( 110-)  A      N
  95 PHE   ( 116-)  A      N
 118 ALA   ( 139-)  A      N
 122 TRP   ( 143-)  A      NE1

Final summary

Note: Summary report for users of a structure

This is an overall summary of the quality of the structure as compared with current reliable structures. This summary is most useful for biologists seeking a good structure to use for modelling calculations.

The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators.


Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:

  1st generation packing quality :  -1.051
  2nd generation packing quality :  -1.371
  Ramachandran plot appearance   :  -2.216
  chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality  :  -2.014
  Backbone conformation          :  -1.531

RMS Z-scores, should be close to 1.0:
  Bond lengths                   :   0.355 (tight)
  Bond angles                    :   0.646 (tight)
  Omega angle restraints         :   0.269 (tight)
  Side chain planarity           :   0.221 (tight)
  Improper dihedral distribution :   0.664
  B-factor distribution          :   1.536 (loose)
  Inside/Outside distribution    :   0.977

Note: Summary report for depositors of a structure

This is an overall summary of the quality of the X-ray structure as compared with structures solved at similar resolutions. This summary can be useful for a crystallographer to see if the structure makes the best possible use of the data. Warning. This table works well for structures solved in the resolution range of the structures in the WHAT IF database, which is presently (summer 2008) mainly 1.1 - 1.3 Angstrom. The further the resolution of your file deviates from this range the more meaningless this table becomes.

The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators, which have been calibrated against structures of similar resolution.

Resolution found in PDB file : 2.70


Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:

  1st generation packing quality :  -0.0
  2nd generation packing quality :   0.2
  Ramachandran plot appearance   :   0.4
  chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality  :   0.2
  Backbone conformation          :  -0.8

RMS Z-scores, should be close to 1.0:
  Bond lengths                   :   0.355 (tight)
  Bond angles                    :   0.646 (tight)
  Omega angle restraints         :   0.269 (tight)
  Side chain planarity           :   0.221 (tight)
  Improper dihedral distribution :   0.664
  B-factor distribution          :   1.536 (loose)
  Inside/Outside distribution    :   0.977
==============

WHAT IF
    G.Vriend,
      WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program,
    J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52--56 (1990).

WHAT_CHECK (verification routines from WHAT IF)
    R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, C.Sander and E.E.Abola,
      Errors in protein structures
    Nature 381, 272 (1996).
    (see also http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/whatcheck for a course and extra inform

Bond lengths and angles, protein residues
    R.Engh and R.Huber,
      Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure
      refinement,
    Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392--400 (1991).

Bond lengths and angles, DNA/RNA
    G.Parkinson, J.Voitechovsky, L.Clowney, A.T.Bruenger and H.Berman,
      New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures
    Acta Crystallogr. D52, 57--64 (1996).

DSSP
    W.Kabsch and C.Sander,
      Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern
      recognition of hydrogen bond and geometrical features
    Biopolymers 22, 2577--2637 (1983).

Hydrogen bond networks
    R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend,
      Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen bond networks in
      protein structures
    PROTEINS, 26, 363--376 (1996).

Matthews' Coefficient
    B.W.Matthews
      Solvent content of Protein Crystals
    J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491--497 (1968).

Protein side chain planarity
    R.W.W. Hooft, C. Sander and G. Vriend,
      Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity
    J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 714--716 (1996).

Puckering parameters
    D.Cremer and J.A.Pople,
      A general definition of ring puckering coordinates
    J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354--1358 (1975).

Quality Control
    G.Vriend and C.Sander,
      Quality control of protein models: directional atomic
      contact analysis,
    J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 47--60 (1993).

Ramachandran plot
    G.N.Ramachandran, C.Ramakrishnan and V.Sasisekharan,
      Stereochemistry of Polypeptide Chain Conformations
    J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95--99 (1963).

Symmetry Checks
    R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend,
      Reconstruction of symmetry related molecules from protein
      data bank (PDB) files
    J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 1006--1009 (1994).

Ion Checks
    I.D.Brown and K.K.Wu,
      Empirical Parameters for Calculating Cation-Oxygen Bond Valences
    Acta Cryst. B32, 1957--1959 (1975).

    M.Nayal and E.Di Cera,
      Valence Screening of Water in Protein Crystals Reveals Potential Na+
      Binding Sites
    J.Mol.Biol. 256 228--234 (1996).

    P.Mueller, S.Koepke and G.M.Sheldrick,
      Is the bond-valence method able to identify metal atoms in protein
      structures?
    Acta Cryst. D 59 32--37 (2003).

Checking checks
    K.Wilson, C.Sander, R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, et al.
      Who checks the checkers
    J.Mol.Biol. (1998) 276,417-436.