Please note that you are looking at an abridged version of the output (all checks that gave normal results have been removed from this report). You can have a look at the Full report instead.
323 GOL ( 317-) A -
Alternate atom indicators in PDB files are known to often be erroneous. It has been observed that alternate atom indicators are missing, or that there are too many of them. It is common to see that the distance between two atoms that should be covalently bound is far too big, but the distance between the alternate A of one of them and alternate B of the other is proper for a covalent bond. We have discovered many, many ways in which alternate atoms can be abused. The software tries to deal with most cases, but we know for sure that it cannot deal with all cases. If an alternate atom indicator problem is not properly solved, subsequent checks will list errors that are based on wrong coordinate combinations. So, any problem listed in this table should be solved before error messages further down in this report can be trusted.
20 ILE ( 20-) A -
In case any of these residues shows up as poor or bad in checks further down this report, please check the consistency of the alternate atoms in this residue first, correct it yourself if needed, and run the validation again.
20 ILE ( 20-) A -
In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. Preferred regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green. A full explanation of the Ramachandran plot together with a series of examples can be found at the WHAT_CHECK website.
Chain identifier: A
Coordinate problems, unexpected atoms, B-factor and occupancy checks
Warning: Missing atoms
The atoms listed in the table below are missing from the entry. If many atoms
are missing, the other checks can become less sensitive. Be aware that it
often happens that groups at the termini of DNA or RNA are really missing,
so that the absence of these atoms normally is neither an error nor the
result of poor electron density. Some of the atoms listed here might also be
listed by other checks, most noticeably by the options in the previous
section that list missing atoms in several categories. The plausible atoms
with zero occupancy are not listed here, as they already got assigned a
non-zero occupancy, and thus are no longer 'missing'.
128 GLN ( 128-) A CG 128 GLN ( 128-) A CD 128 GLN ( 128-) A OE1 128 GLN ( 128-) A NE2 158 GLN ( 158-) A CG 158 GLN ( 158-) A CD 158 GLN ( 158-) A OE1 158 GLN ( 158-) A NE2 182 LYS ( 182-) A CG 182 LYS ( 182-) A CD 182 LYS ( 182-) A CE 182 LYS ( 182-) A NZ
Obviously, the temperature at which the X-ray data was collected has some importance too:
Crystal temperature (K) :100.000
Note: B-factor plot
The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue
Chain identifier: A
Nomenclature related problems
Warning: Arginine nomenclature problem
The arginine residues listed in the table below have their N-H-1 and N-H-2
101 ARG ( 101-) A
29 TYR ( 29-) A 179 TYR ( 179-) A
57 ASP ( 57-) A
RMS Z-score for bond lengths: 0.460
RMS-deviation in bond distances: 0.010
Warning: Possible cell scaling problem
Comparison of bond distances with Engh and Huber [REF] standard values for
protein residues and Parkinson et al [REF] values for DNA/RNA shows a
significant systematic deviation. It could be that the unit cell used in
refinement was not accurate enough. The deformation matrix given below gives
the deviations found: the three numbers on the diagonal represent the
relative corrections needed along the A, B and C cell axis. These values are
1.000 in a normal case, but have significant deviations here (significant at
the 99.99 percent confidence level)
There are a number of different possible causes for the discrepancy. First the cell used in refinement can be different from the best cell calculated. Second, the value of the wavelength used for a synchrotron data set can be miscalibrated. Finally, the discrepancy can be caused by a dataset that has not been corrected for significant anisotropic thermal motion.
Please note that the proposed scale matrix has NOT been restrained to obey the space group symmetry. This is done on purpose. The distortions can give you an indication of the accuracy of the determination.
If you intend to use the result of this check to change the cell dimension of your crystal, please read the extensive literature on this topic first. This check depends on the wavelength, the cell dimensions, and on the standard bond lengths and bond angles used by your refinement software.
Unit Cell deformation matrix
| 0.996603 -0.000614 0.001447| | -0.000614 0.999768 0.000916| | 0.001447 0.000916 0.997517|Proposed new scale matrix
| 0.010772 0.006204 -0.000021| | 0.000008 0.012395 -0.000011| | -0.000011 -0.000007 0.007774|With corresponding cell
A = 92.863 B = 93.135 C = 128.629 Alpha= 89.992 Beta= 89.834 Gamma= 119.974
The CRYST1 cell dimensions
A = 93.183 B = 93.183 C = 128.952 Alpha= 90.000 Beta= 90.000 Gamma= 120.000
(Under-)estimated Z-score: 5.533
Warning: Unusual bond angles
The bond angles listed in the table below were found to deviate more than 4
sigma from standard bond angles (both standard values and sigma for protein
residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from
Parkinson et al [REF]). In the table below for each strange angle the bond
angle and the number of standard deviations it differs from the standard
values is given. Please note that disulphide bridges are neglected. Atoms
starting with "-" belong to the previous residue in the sequence.
16 ASP ( 16-) A CB CG OD1 127.78 4.1 33 ASN ( 33-) A ND2 CG OD1 127.86 5.3 114 PHE ( 114-) A CA CB CG 118.67 4.9 116 ASN ( 116-) A ND2 CG OD1 127.18 4.6 130 PHE ( 130-) A CA CB CG 118.14 4.3 138 ASP ( 138-) A CA CB CG 117.17 4.6 142 HIS ( 142-) A CG ND1 CE1 109.96 4.4 142 HIS ( 142-) A NE2 CD2 CG 111.46 5.0 142 HIS ( 142-) A CB CG CD2 139.03 7.6 143 GLU ( 143-) A -C N CA 113.88 -4.3 159 ASN ( 159-) A CA CB CG 107.34 -5.3 172 PHE ( 172-) A CA CB CG 105.80 -8.0 250 HIS ( 250-) A CG ND1 CE1 111.36 5.8 308 GLN ( 308-) A NE2 CD OE1 117.30 -5.3 310 PHE ( 310-) A CA CB CG 109.52 -4.3
57 ASP ( 57-) A 101 ARG ( 101-) A
These scores give an impression of how `normal' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.
20 ILE ( 20-) A -2.4 107 SER ( 107-) A -2.4 92 SER ( 92-) A -2.3 25 SER ( 25-) A -2.1
Residues with `forbidden' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.
26 THR ( 26-) A Poor phi/psi 46 TYR ( 46-) A Poor phi/psi 50 LEU ( 50-) A PRO omega poor 60 ASN ( 60-) A Poor phi/psi 92 SER ( 92-) A Poor phi/psi 97 ASN ( 97-) A Poor phi/psi 105 HIS ( 105-) A Poor phi/psi 107 SER ( 107-) A Poor phi/psi 118 SER ( 118-) A Poor phi/psi 130 PHE ( 130-) A omega poor 132 PRO ( 132-) A omega poor 152 THR ( 152-) A Poor phi/psi 159 ASN ( 159-) A Poor phi/psi 181 ASN ( 181-) A Poor phi/psi 226 ASP ( 226-) A Poor phi/psi 274 TYR ( 274-) A Poor phi/psi 295 LEU ( 295-) A omega poor chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -0.132
For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.
A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!
5 SER ( 5-) A 0 14 LEU ( 14-) A 0 24 TYR ( 24-) A 0 25 SER ( 25-) A 0 26 THR ( 26-) A 0 27 TYR ( 27-) A 0 30 LEU ( 30-) A 0 34 THR ( 34-) A 0 35 ARG ( 35-) A 0 37 ASN ( 37-) A 0 45 LYS ( 45-) A 0 46 TYR ( 46-) A 0 51 PRO ( 51-) A 0 53 SER ( 53-) A 0 55 TRP ( 55-) A 0 58 ALA ( 58-) A 0 60 ASN ( 60-) A 0 61 GLN ( 61-) A 0 62 PHE ( 62-) A 0 63 PHE ( 63-) A 0 88 HIS ( 88-) A 0 91 LEU ( 91-) A 0 92 SER ( 92-) A 0 96 ASN ( 96-) A 0 104 VAL ( 104-) A 0And so on for a total of 123 lines.
132 PRO ( 132-) A 0.47 HIGH
The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centres of the two atoms. Although we believe that two water atoms at 2.4 A distance are too close, we only report water pairs that are closer than this rather short distance.
The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterion was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1-3 and 1-4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). BL indicates that the B-factors of the clashing atoms have a low B-factor thereby making this clash even more worrisome. INTRA and INTER indicate whether the clashes are between atoms in the same asymmetric unit, or atoms in symmetry related asymmetric units, respectively.
219 LYS ( 219-) A NZ <-> 324 HOH (2197 ) A O 0.20 2.50 INTRA 265 LYS ( 265-) A NZ <-> 324 HOH (2130 ) A O 0.18 2.52 INTRA 207 ASP ( 207-) A OD1 <-> 324 HOH (2295 ) A O 0.10 2.30 INTRA 116 ASN ( 116-) A O <-> 324 HOH (2313 ) A O 0.10 2.30 INTRA 210 LYS ( 210-) A NZ <-> 324 HOH (2175 ) A O 0.09 2.61 INTRA BF 150 ASP ( 150-) A OD2 <-> 324 HOH (2283 ) A O 0.09 2.31 INTRA 262 LYS ( 262-) A NZ <-> 302 GLU ( 302-) A OE2 0.08 2.62 INTRA 120 MET ( 120-) A SD <-> 143 GLU ( 143-) A CB 0.08 3.32 INTRA 243 LEU ( 243-) A O <-> 247 GLY ( 247-) A N 0.07 2.63 INTRA BL 21 ASN ( 21-) A ND2 <-> 324 HOH (2145 ) A O 0.06 2.64 INTRA 206 SER ( 206-) A O <-> 239 LYS ( 239-) A NZ 0.04 2.66 INTRA 1 ILE ( 1-) A N <-> 31 GLN ( 31-) A OE1 0.04 2.66 INTRA 182 LYS ( 182-) A N <-> 324 HOH (2177 ) A O 0.03 2.67 INTRA 150 ASP ( 150-) A OD2 <-> 324 HOH (2291 ) A O 0.02 2.38 INTRA 18 LYS ( 18-) A NZ <-> 72 ASP ( 72-) A OD1 0.01 2.69 INTRA BL 226 ASP ( 226-) A OD1 <-> 231 HIS ( 231-) A ND1 0.01 2.69 INTRA BL 112 ASN ( 112-) A CG <-> 113 ALA ( 113-) A N 0.01 2.99 INTRA 81 TYR ( 81-) A OH <-> 97 ASN ( 97-) A ND2 0.01 2.69 INTRA BL 183 ASN ( 183-) A N <-> 184 PRO ( 184-) A CD 0.01 2.99 INTRA
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.
The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.
88 HIS ( 88-) A -5.86 221 TYR ( 221-) A -5.68 108 GLN ( 108-) A -5.66 246 GLN ( 246-) A -5.54 251 TYR ( 251-) A -5.40 273 GLN ( 273-) A -5.34 225 GLN ( 225-) A -5.33 157 TYR ( 157-) A -5.25
The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue score of the series.
225 GLN ( 225-) A 228 - GLY 228- ( A) -4.53
Chain identifier: A
Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues
The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing
environment according to the 2nd generation packing check. The score
listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means
better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues
scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the unusual
residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a
special look at them.
44 ALA ( 44-) A -2.69 182 LYS ( 182-) A -2.64 25 SER ( 25-) A -2.58
Chain identifier: A
Water, ion, and hydrogenbond related checks
Error: HIS, ASN, GLN side chain flips
Listed here are Histidine, Asparagine or Glutamine residues for
which the orientation determined from hydrogen bonding analysis are
different from the assignment given in the input. Either they could
form energetically more favourable hydrogen bonds if the terminal
group was rotated by 180 degrees, or there is no assignment in the
input file (atom type 'A') but an assignment could be made. Be aware,
though, that if the topology could not be determined for one or more
ligands, then this option will make errors.
96 ASN ( 96-) A
Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.
Waters are not listed by this option.
35 ARG ( 35-) A N 49 THR ( 49-) A N 97 ASN ( 97-) A ND2 112 ASN ( 112-) A N 138 ASP ( 138-) A N 155 LEU ( 155-) A N 216 HIS ( 216-) A N Only metal coordination for 177 GLU ( 177-) A OE1 Only metal coordination for 190 GLU ( 190-) A OE2
Side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors buried inside the protein normally form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any not hydrogen bonded in the optimized hydrogen bond network they will be listed here.
Waters are not listed by this option.
43 ASP ( 43-) A OD2 238 ASN ( 238-) A OD1
The output gives the ion, the valency score for the ion itself, the valency score for the suggested alternative ion, and a series of possible comments *1 indicates that the suggested alternate atom type has been observed in the PDB file at another location in space. *2 indicates that WHAT IF thinks to have found this ion type in the crystallisation conditions as described in the REMARK 280 cards of the PDB file. *S Indicates that this ions is located at a special position (i.e. at a symmetry axis). N4 stands for NH4+.
318 CA (2000-) A -.- -.- Part of ionic cluster 318 CA (2000-) A 0.78 1.02 Scores about as good as NA 319 CA (2001-) A -.- -.- Part of ionic cluster 320 CA (2002-) A 0.88 1.13 Scores about as good as NA 321 CA (2003-) A 0.90 1.14 Scores about as good as NA
124 ASP ( 124-) A H-bonding suggests Asn; but Alt-Rotamer 150 ASP ( 150-) A H-bonding suggests Asn; but Alt-Rotamer 294 ASP ( 294-) A H-bonding suggests Asn; but Alt-Rotamer
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators.
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : -0.700 2nd generation packing quality : -1.307 Ramachandran plot appearance : -0.429 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : -0.132 Backbone conformation : -0.203
Bond lengths : 0.460 (tight) Bond angles : 1.191 Omega angle restraints : 1.007 Side chain planarity : 0.482 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.662 B-factor distribution : 1.276 Inside/Outside distribution : 1.021
The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement restraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of global quality indicators, which have been calibrated against structures of similar resolution.
Resolution found in PDB file : 1.55
Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:
1st generation packing quality : -0.4 2nd generation packing quality : -1.4 Ramachandran plot appearance : -0.9 chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality : -0.6 Backbone conformation : -0.6
Bond lengths : 0.460 (tight) Bond angles : 1.191 Omega angle restraints : 1.007 Side chain planarity : 0.482 (tight) Improper dihedral distribution : 0.662 B-factor distribution : 1.276 Inside/Outside distribution : 1.021 ==============
WHAT IF G.Vriend, WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program, J. Mol. Graph. 8, 52--56 (1990). WHAT_CHECK (verification routines from WHAT IF) R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, C.Sander and E.E.Abola, Errors in protein structures Nature 381, 272 (1996). (see also http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/whatcheck for a course and extra inform Bond lengths and angles, protein residues R.Engh and R.Huber, Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement, Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392--400 (1991). Bond lengths and angles, DNA/RNA G.Parkinson, J.Voitechovsky, L.Clowney, A.T.Bruenger and H.Berman, New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures Acta Crystallogr. D52, 57--64 (1996). DSSP W.Kabsch and C.Sander, Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen bond and geometrical features Biopolymers 22, 2577--2637 (1983). Hydrogen bond networks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen bond networks in protein structures PROTEINS, 26, 363--376 (1996). Matthews' Coefficient B.W.Matthews Solvent content of Protein Crystals J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491--497 (1968). Protein side chain planarity R.W.W. Hooft, C. Sander and G. Vriend, Verification of protein structures: side-chain planarity J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 714--716 (1996). Puckering parameters D.Cremer and J.A.Pople, A general definition of ring puckering coordinates J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354--1358 (1975). Quality Control G.Vriend and C.Sander, Quality control of protein models: directional atomic contact analysis, J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 47--60 (1993). Ramachandran plot G.N.Ramachandran, C.Ramakrishnan and V.Sasisekharan, Stereochemistry of Polypeptide Chain Conformations J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95--99 (1963). Symmetry Checks R.W.W.Hooft, C.Sander and G.Vriend, Reconstruction of symmetry related molecules from protein data bank (PDB) files J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 1006--1009 (1994). Ion Checks I.D.Brown and K.K.Wu, Empirical Parameters for Calculating Cation-Oxygen Bond Valences Acta Cryst. B32, 1957--1959 (1975). M.Nayal and E.Di Cera, Valence Screening of Water in Protein Crystals Reveals Potential Na+ Binding Sites J.Mol.Biol. 256 228--234 (1996). P.Mueller, S.Koepke and G.M.Sheldrick, Is the bond-valence method able to identify metal atoms in protein structures? Acta Cryst. D 59 32--37 (2003). Checking checks K.Wilson, C.Sander, R.W.W.Hooft, G.Vriend, et al. Who checks the checkers J.Mol.Biol. (1998) 276,417-436.